### 1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: EUR-Lex is the official database of EU law, case law, and public documents, published in 24 EU languages, per web results. It includes the Official Journal, treaties, directives, regulations, and CJEU case law, with searches by keyword, CELEX number, ECLI, document type, date, and metadata. Advanced search supports Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), exact phrases, and filters for sector (e.g., competition, environment), per. Registered users can use expert search for complex queries. It’s critical for finding EU competition, state aid, and environmental violation cases.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EUR-Lex)
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander competition law” with sector filter “competition” and date 2020-2025 to identify antitrust or merger cases, supporting competition claims. Search “banking Amazon deforestation” with sector “environment” to find cases linking banks to harmful financing, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims tied to BANKS AMMU. Search “AML banking violation” to uncover anti-money laundering breaches, supporting negligence and statutory duty claims, per TI_ BORs.pdf. Use exact phrases like “abuse of dominance” or “state aid banking” and combine with AND (e.g., “HSBC AND greenwashing”). If available, use ECLI for precise case retrieval.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Competition searches target breaches (e.g., cartels, market dominance), tied to MA DISCLOSURES’ undisclosed mergers. Environmental searches support complicity and greenwashing, linked to Amazon financing. AML searches address negligence and statutory duty breaches (5AMLD, FSMA 2000), per TI’s transparency findings. These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider risks (QOL 3, QOL 4), as BoE should monitor EU-linked violations.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: CJEU cases on banks could ground follow-on competition claims, strengthening private claims and JR arguments of BoE’s oversight failures. Environmental cases linking banks to deforestation support complicity claims, while AML violations bolster negligence claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Fortress (opportunities@fortress.com). Manually search or use API for automated queries.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EUR-Lex)[](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/collection/eu-law/eu-case-law.html)
—
### 2. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/business-and-property-courts
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The Business and Property Courts, part of the UK High Court, handle commercial, financial, and insolvency disputes, per. The website offers case listings and judgments, searchable by case name, number, or date, with no explicit advanced search rules but implied keyword search functionality. It’s key for finding UK litigation involving banks.[](https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/companies-house)
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander litigation” with date filter 2020-2025 to find cases on negligence or competition breaches. Search “Credit Suisse negligence” for post-FINMA finding cases (2021-2022). Search “banking ESG greenwashing” to uncover environmental misconduct cases, supporting complicity claims. Use keywords “breach of duty” or “cartel banking” for precision, focusing on Chancery or Commercial Court judgments.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Litigation searches target negligence (e.g., governance failures) and competition breaches, tied to MA DISCLOSURES and FINMA’s CS finding. ESG searches support complicity and greenwashing, linked to Amazon financing. These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and procedural impropriety, as BoE’s oversight should address such disputes.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Judgments could evidence bank misconduct, supporting negligence and competition claims, and JR arguments of regulatory gaps. ESG cases strengthen complicity claims, boosting monetization for funders like Harbour (info@harbourlf.com). Manually search case listings or judgments.
—
### 3. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/advanced-search
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: Companies House’s advanced search provides UK company data, including registered office, directors, PSC registers, and filings (e.g., annual reports, mergers), per. It supports searches by company name, CRN, SIC code, status, and date, with filters for filing type and insolvency data, ideal for mapping corporate structures and mergers.[](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/)[](https://www.gov.uk/guidance/search-the-companies-house-register)
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Holdings PLC”, “Barclays PLC”, “Santander UK PLC” by name or CRN, with SIC 6419 (banking) and date 2020-2025, to retrieve PSC, director, and merger filings, supporting negligence and competition claims. Search “Credit Suisse” for UK entity data post-FINMA finding. Search “Amazon deforestation” in annual reports for ESG disclosures, supporting complicity claims. Use exact phrases like “merger acquisition” or “ESG compliance” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: PSC and merger searches target negligence (governance failures) and competition breaches (market concentration), tied to MA DISCLOSURES and FINMA’s CS finding. ESG searches support complicity and greenwashing, linked to Amazon financing and TI’s transparency issues. These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider risks.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: PSC and merger data could reveal opaque structures or consolidations, supporting negligence, competition, and JR claims. ESG disclosures contradicting Amazon financing strengthen complicity claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Certum (info@certumgroup.com). Manually search or use Companies House API.[](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/)[](https://www.gov.uk/guidance/search-the-companies-house-register)
—
### 4. https://resources.companieshouse.gov.uk/sic/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: This Companies House page lists Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes for business activities, per. It supports searches by keyword or SIC code (e.g., 6419 for banking) to identify company activities, with no advanced search rules but critical for refining searches on other platforms.[](https://resources.companieshouse.gov.uk/sic/)
**Search Strategy**: Search “banking” to confirm SIC 6419, then use this code in Companies House advanced search for “HSBC Barclays Santander” to identify banking-related filings (2020-2025), supporting competition claims. Search “financial services” for related codes to map merger activities, tied to MA DISCLOSURES. Search “environmental services” for ESG-related activities, supporting complicity claims.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Banking searches target competition breaches (market concentration), tied to MA DISCLOSURES. ESG searches support complicity, linked to Amazon financing. These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider market risks.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: SIC code data refines merger searches, supporting competition claims and JR arguments. ESG activity data strengthens complicity claims, boosting monetization for funders like Bench Walk (info@benchwalk.com). Manually extract SIC codes for use in other searches.[](https://resources.companieshouse.gov.uk/sic/)
—
### 5. https://petition.parliament.uk/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The UK Parliament petitions site allows public submissions on policy issues, searchable by keyword, status (open, closed), and date, per web results. It’s useful for identifying public concerns about banking practices, relevant to externality costs and JR grounds.
**Search Strategy**: Search “banking misconduct HSBC Barclays Santander” with date 2020-2025 to find petitions on AML or ESG violations, supporting negligence and statutory duty claims. Search “bank branch closures” to identify externality harms (e.g., community impacts), supporting externality claims. Search “BoE supervision” to uncover petitions on regulatory failures, supporting JR grounds. Use exact phrases like “greenwashing banking” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Misconduct searches target negligence and statutory duty breaches, per TI’s findings. Branch closure searches support externality costs, linked to BANKS AMMU’s closure data. BoE searches address JR grounds of irrationality and procedural impropriety, tied to FINMA’s CS finding.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Petitions could evidence public harm from bank practices, supporting negligence, externality, and JR claims. ESG-related petitions strengthen complicity claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Fortress. Manually search petition archives.
—
### 6. https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-financial-interests/parliamentary-commissioner-for-standards/registers-of-interests/register-of-members-financial-interests/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The Register of Members’ Financial Interests lists MPs’ financial ties, searchable by MP name, interest type, and date, per web results. No advanced search rules are specified, but keyword searches can identify conflicts of interest involving banks.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander” with date 2020-2025 to identify MPs with financial ties to banks, supporting negligence claims (e.g., governance influenced by conflicts). Search “Credit Suisse” for ties post-FINMA finding. Search “Amazon deforestation” for links to financed entities, supporting complicity claims. Use keywords “banking consultancy” or “ESG investment” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Bank searches target negligence (governance failures), tied to TI’s transparency issues. CS searches align with FINMA’s finding. ESG searches support complicity, linked to Amazon financing. These support JR grounds of irrationality, as BoE should monitor conflicts.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: MP financial ties could evidence undue influence, supporting negligence and JR claims. ESG links strengthen complicity claims, boosting monetization for funders like Harbour. Manually search the register.
—
### 7. https://www.theyworkforyou.com/interests/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: TheyWorkForYou tracks MPs’ interests and parliamentary activities, searchable by MP name, keyword, and date, per web results. It aggregates financial interest data, ideal for identifying bank-related conflicts, with no explicit advanced search rules.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander” with date 2020-2025 to find MPs’ financial ties to banks, supporting negligence claims. Search “Credit Suisse” for ties post-FINMA finding. Search “Amazon deforestation financing” for links to financed entities, supporting complicity claims. Use keywords “banking consultancy” or “greenwashing” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Bank searches target negligence (governance failures), tied to TI’s findings. CS searches align with FINMA’s finding. ESG searches support complicity, linked to Amazon financing. These support JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider risks.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Financial ties could evidence governance issues, supporting negligence and JR claims. ESG links strengthen complicity claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Certum. Manually search the interest database.
—
### 8. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: HUDOC, the European Court of Human Rights database, provides ECHR case law, searchable by case name, application number, keyword, article (e.g., Article 8), and date, per web results. It supports Boolean operators and filters for violation type, ideal for human rights-related banking claims.
**Search Strategy**: Search “banking misconduct” with date 2020-2025 and article filter “Article 8” (right to private life) to find cases on financial mismanagement impacting communities, supporting externality claims. Search “HSBC Barclays Santander” for bank-specific cases, supporting negligence claims. Search “environmental harm financing” for ESG-related cases, supporting complicity claims. Use exact phrases like “banking negligence” or “deforestation impact” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Misconduct searches target negligence and externality costs, tied to BANKS AMMU’s closure data. ESG searches support complicity, linked to Amazon financing. These support JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider societal impacts.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: ECHR rulings could evidence human rights impacts of bank practices, supporting negligence, externality, and JR claims. ESG cases strengthen complicity claims, boosting monetization for funders like Fortress. Manually search HUDOC.
—
### 9. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/have-your-say
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The EU’s Have Your Say portal allows public feedback on EU initiatives, searchable by keyword, policy area (e.g., competition, environment), and status (open, closed), per web results. It’s useful for identifying stakeholder concerns about banking practices.
**Search Strategy**: Search “banking competition law” with policy area “competition” and date 2020-2025 to find feedback on market distortions, supporting competition claims. Search “banking ESG Amazon” with policy area “environment” for concerns about deforestation financing, supporting complicity claims. Search “AML banking” for regulatory feedback, supporting negligence claims. Use keywords “state aid banking” or “greenwashing” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Competition searches target breaches, tied to MA DISCLOSURES. ESG searches support complicity, linked to Amazon financing. AML searches address negligence, per TI’s findings. These support JR grounds of irrationality and procedural impropriety.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Stakeholder feedback could evidence public harm from bank practices, supporting competition, complicity, and JR claims. This enhances monetization for funders like Harbour. Manually search the portal.
—
### 10. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The National Archives hosts UK government records, including legislation and reports, per. It supports searches by keyword, record type (e.g., legislation, departmental papers), and date, with Boolean operators for precision, ideal for regulatory and historical data.[](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/)
**Search Strategy**: Search “BoE supervision banking” with record type “departmental papers” and date 2020-2025 to find regulatory oversight reports, supporting JR grounds. Search “HSBC Barclays Santander misconduct” for FCA reports, supporting negligence claims. Search “banking ESG” for environmental policy records, supporting complicity claims. Use exact phrases like “AML failure” or “deforestation financing” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: BoE searches target JR grounds of irrationality and procedural impropriety, tied to FINMA’s CS finding. Misconduct searches support negligence, per TI’s findings. ESG searches address complicity, linked to Amazon financing.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Regulatory reports could evidence BoE’s oversight failures, supporting JR claims. FCA reports strengthen negligence claims, while ESG records support complicity claims, boosting monetization for funders like Certum. Manually search or use API.[](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/)
1. https://www.tron.trade.ec.europa.eu/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The TRON portal, part of the EU’s Access2Markets suite, details trade defence investigations like anti-dumping and anti-subsidy cases, as well as dispute settlement cases, per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf. It supports searches by case number, company name, product, and country, with filters for investigation type (e.g., countervailing measures) and status (ongoing, closed). Web result
—
### 2. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The EU Trade Directorate General’s website covers trade policy, agreements, and economic security, per[](https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/home)
—
### 3. https://showvoc.op.europa.eu/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: SHOWVOC is the EU’s multilingual thesaurus for controlled vocabularies, supporting searches by keyword, concept, or domain (e.g., economics, environment), per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf. It allows Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) and filtering by language or vocabulary type, ideal for mapping legal and trade terms to our claims.
**Search Strategy**: Search “banking competition law” with domain filter “economics” to identify terms for competition breaches, supporting claims against banks. Search “environmental damage financing” with domain “environment” to map terms for complicity and greenwashing claims tied to Amazon financing. Search “AML compliance” to find terms for statutory duty breaches, leveraging TI_ BORs.pdf. Use exact phrases like “abuse of dominance” or “deforestation financing” and date range 2020-2025. Combine terms with AND (e.g., “banking AND state aid”) for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Competition searches target breaches (e.g., abuse of dominance), tied to MA DISCLOSURES’ undisclosed mergers. Environmental searches support complicity and greenwashing, linked to Amazon financing (BANKS AMMU). AML searches address negligence and statutory duty breaches, per TI’s findings. These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider risks.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Thesaurus terms could refine searches on other platforms (e.g., TRON, EDGAR), ensuring precise evidence for competition and complicity claims. This strengthens JR arguments and monetization for funders like Certum (info@certumgroup.com). Manually search SHOWVOC to extract relevant terms.
—
### 4. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: Eurostat, the EU’s statistical office, provides harmonized data on trade, economics, and environment, per[](https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-euro-indicators/w/6-23042025-bp)
—
### 5. https://data.gov.uk/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: Data.gov.uk provides UK public sector datasets, including finance and trade, per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf. It supports keyword searches with filters for publisher (e.g., FCA, CMA), theme (e.g., business), and date, ideal for regulatory and economic data.
**Search Strategy**: Search “banking misconduct HSBC Barclays Santander” with publisher filter “FCA” and date 2020-2025 to identify enforcement actions, supporting negligence and statutory duty claims. Search “banking mergers” with publisher “CMA” to uncover market concentration, supporting competition claims. Search “ESG banking” to find sustainability data, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims. Use exact phrases like “AML violation” or “deforestation financing” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Misconduct searches target negligence and statutory duty breaches, leveraging TI’s transparency findings. Merger searches support competition claims, tied to MA DISCLOSURES. ESG searches address complicity, linked to Amazon financing (BANKS AMMU). These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and procedural impropriety.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: FCA enforcement data could evidence AML failures, supporting negligence claims and JR arguments. CMA merger data strengthens competition claims, while ESG data supports complicity claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Harbour. Manually search or use API.
—
### 6. https://violationtrackeruk.org/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: Violation Tracker UK, developed by Good Jobs First, tracks corporate regulatory violations, per web results. It supports searches by company, industry (e.g., financial services), violation type (e.g., AML, competition), and date, ideal for identifying bank misconduct.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander” with industry “financial services” and violation types “AML” or “competition” (2020-2025) to identify regulatory breaches, supporting negligence and competition claims. Search “Credit Suisse” for violations post-FINMA finding. Search “ESG violation banking” to uncover environmental misconduct, supporting complicity claims. Use keywords “greenwashing” or “deforestation financing” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Bank searches target negligence (AML failures) and competition breaches, tied to TI’s findings and MA DISCLOSURES. CS searches align with FINMA’s finding. ESG searches support complicity, linked to Amazon financing. These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider risks.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Violation data could evidence AML or competition breaches, supporting negligence and JR claims. ESG violations strengthen complicity claims, boosting monetization for funders like Certum. Manually search the database.
—
### 7. https://catribunal.org.uk/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) handles appeals and follow-on damages claims for competition law breaches, per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf. It supports searches by case number, party, and date, with filters for case type (e.g., antitrust, merger appeals).
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander” with case type “antitrust” or “merger appeals” (2020-2025) to identify competition law breaches, supporting competition claims. Search “Credit Suisse” for appeals post-FINMA finding. Use keywords “abuse of dominance” or “cartel banking” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Bank searches target competition breaches, tied to MA DISCLOSURES’ undisclosed mergers and potential CMA findings. CS searches align with FINMA’s finding. These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider market risks.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: CAT rulings could ground follow-on competition claims, supporting private claims and JR arguments. This enhances monetization for funders like Fortress. Manually search case archives.
—
### 8. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/competition-and-markets-authority
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The CMA’s website provides case data on competition, mergers, and consumer protection, per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf. It supports searches by keyword, case type (e.g., merger, antitrust), and date, with filters for sector (e.g., financial services).
**Search Strategy**: Search “banking mergers HSBC Barclays Santander” with case type “merger” and date 2020-2025 to uncover market concentration, supporting competition claims. Search “banking antitrust” for anti-competitive practices, supporting competition claims. Search “ESG banking violation” for environmental misconduct, supporting complicity claims. Use keywords “significant lessening of competition” or “greenwashing” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Merger and antitrust searches target competition breaches, tied to MA DISCLOSURES. ESG searches support complicity, linked to Amazon financing. These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider risks.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: CMA case data could evidence market dominance or anti-competitive practices, supporting competition claims and JR arguments. ESG violations strengthen complicity claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Harbour. Manually search case pages.[](https://european-union.europa.eu/index_en)
—
### 9. https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The EU Competition Policy portal tracks antitrust, cartel, merger, and state aid cases, per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf. It supports searches by case number, company, and NACE code, with filters for case type and status, ideal for competition and state aid claims.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander” with case type “merger” or “antitrust” and NACE K64 (2020-2025) to identify competition breaches, supporting competition claims. Search “state aid banking UK” for subsidy violations, supporting state aid claims. Search “ESG banking Amazon” for environmental misconduct, supporting complicity claims. Use keywords “abuse of dominance” or “deforestation financing” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Merger/antitrust searches target competition breaches, tied to MA DISCLOSURES. State aid searches support subsidy control claims. ESG searches address complicity, linked to Amazon financing. These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider risks.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: EU case data could ground follow-on competition claims and JR arguments. ESG findings strengthen complicity claims, boosting monetization for funders like Fortress. Manually search or use API.[](https://european-union.europa.eu/index_en)
—
### 10. https://www.bailii.org/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: BAILII provides UK and EU case law, per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf. It supports searches by keyword, case name, court (e.g., High Court, CAT), and date, with Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) for precision, ideal for legal precedents.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander competition law” with court filter “CAT” and date 2020-2025 to find competition law precedents, supporting competition claims. Search “banking negligence” for High Court cases, supporting negligence claims. Search “ESG greenwashing banking” for environmental cases, supporting complicity claims. Use exact phrases like “abuse of dominance” or “deforestation financing” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Competition searches target breaches, tied to MA DISCLOSURES. Negligence searches support statutory duty claims, per TI’s findings. ESG searches address complicity, linked to Amazon financing. These support BoE JR grounds of irrationality and procedural impropriety.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Case law could provide precedents for competition and negligence claims, supporting JR arguments. ESG cases strengthen complicity claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Certum. Manually search BAILII’s database.
### 1. https://www.opensanctions.org/advancedsearch/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: OpenSanctions aggregates sanctions lists, politically exposed persons (PEPs), and entities of interest from 287 global sources, covering nearly 2 million entities as of June 26, 2025, based on web results. The advanced search, as described in SEARCHLINK Model.pdf and web results, offers a multi-property matching tool with fuzzy matching and transliteration, allowing searches by name, nationality, address, and other criteria. Users can filter by entity type (Person, Legal Entity), topics (e.g., Sanctioned entity, PEP, Crime), data sources (e.g., US OFAC SDN, UK Sanctions List), and countries. The search returns up to five results with relevance scores explaining match quality. SEARCHLINK Model.pdf highlights its role in due diligence, enabling identification of sanctions or PEP connections, with API support for automated monitoring. The platform is critical for uncovering AML violations or governance issues relevant to our claims.
**Search Strategy**: To gather evidence supporting our causes of action (negligence, statutory duty breaches, complicity, greenwashing) and infringement findings (FINMA’s CS breaches, potential FCA/CMA ESG/competition findings, TI’s transparency issues), I propose a precise strategy. Search “HSBC Holdings PLC”, “Barclays PLC”, “Santander UK PLC” with entity type “Legal Entity”, country filter “United Kingdom”, and topics “Sanctioned entity” or “PEP” to identify AML or governance violations, supporting negligence claims for failure to comply with FSMA 2000 and 5AMLD, and statutory duty breaches. Search “Credit Suisse” with the same filters to uncover UK sanctions or PEP links post-FINMA’s 2021-2022 supervisory breach findings, reinforcing negligence claims. Search “JBS SA” and “Cargill” with country filter “Brazil” and topic “Sanction-linked entity” to link banks’ Amazon financing to sanctioned entities, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims tied to BANKS AMMU findings. Use fuzzy matching for name variations (e.g., “HSBC Bank”, “Banco Santander”, “JBS Global”) and combine with keywords “AML violation” or “deforestation financing” in the query text. Set date range 2020-2025 if available to focus on recent data within the six-year limitation period for negligence and competition claims (Limitation Act 1980, s.2, s.5). For automation, use the /match API with parameters: {“schema”: “LegalEntity”, “properties”: {“name”: [“HSBC Holdings PLC”], “country”: [“UK”], “topics”: [“sanction”]}} and schedule daily checks for new entries.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: The HSBC, Barclays, and Santander searches target negligence by seeking evidence of AML compliance failures, leveraging TI_ BORs.pdf’s findings on poor bank transparency and Spanish Guidance-Beneficial-Ownership-Legal-Persons.pdf’s emphasis on 5AMLD requirements for beneficial ownership disclosure. Statutory duty breaches are supported if banks failed to report sanctions or PEP compliance under FSMA 2000 or 5AMLD, aligning with TI’s findings. The CS search aligns with FINMA’s finding of supervisory breaches, seeking UK sanctions data to evidence similar negligence in risk management (e.g., liquidity issues from BANKS AMMU). The JBS/Cargill search targets complicity and greenwashing, linking Amazon financing to sanctioned entities, which could breach public interest duties under the UK National Security and Investment Act, as highlighted in BANKS AMMU. These searches support the BoE JR by evidencing AML/ESG supervisory gaps (irrationality, QOL 4; failure to consider relevant factors, QOL 3), as the BoE’s oversight should address such risks, per the Letter Before Claim citing FPC records.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Sanctions or PEP data on HSBC, Barclays, or Santander could evidence AML failures, supporting negligence claims by showing inadequate due diligence (e.g., failure to screen sanctioned entities), and statutory duty breaches if FSMA or 5AMLD obligations were unmet. For example, a sanctioned director or subsidiary could indicate governance failures, aligning with TI’s transparency scores. CS sanctions data would reinforce negligence claims, paralleling FINMA’s findings of control weaknesses, and support JR arguments of BoE’s failure to monitor systemic risks (e.g., CS’s 41% deposit outflow, LCR drop from 203% to 144%). JBS/Cargill sanctions links would strengthen complicity claims, proving banks’ financing enabled harmful activities (e.g., deforestation), and greenwashing claims if their ESG commitments (e.g., from annual reports) are contradicted, per BANKS AMMU’s Amazon financing evidence. For the BoE JR, sanctions data underscores regulatory oversight failures, supporting irrationality (QOL 4) and procedural impropriety (QOL 1) claims, as the BoE’s generic response to COCOO’s concerns (Letter Before Claim) ignored such risks. For monetization, sanctions-related claims are high-value due to their public interest and cross-border impact, attractive to funders like Fortress Investment Group (opportunities@fortress.com) or Harbour Litigation Funding (info@harbourlf.com), who explicitly purchase claims (HOW 2 SELL MY LITIGATION). To execute, manually search the advanced interface or integrate the /match API, testing parameters on a sandbox like test.opensanctions.org. Results could yield specific entities (e.g., sanctioned directors), penalties, or dates, enhancing claim credibility within limitation periods.
—
### 2. https://www.opensanctions.org/docs/api/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: This page details OpenSanctions’ API for entity search and bulk matching, aggregating sanctions and PEP data across 287 global sources, as per web results. The /search endpoint supports full-text searches with parameters like “q” (search text), “schema” (e.g., LegalEntity, Person), “limit” (result count), and “sort” (e.g., relevancy, first_seen:desc). The /match endpoint enables bulk screening with multi-property matching (e.g., name, country, topics), using fuzzy matching and algorithms like logic-v1. SEARCHLINK Model.pdf notes the API’s fuzzy matching and nationality filtering, ideal for due diligence on banks and their associates, supporting automated monitoring of sanctions or PEP status changes.
**Search Strategy**: To support our causes of action and infringement findings, I propose using the /match API to screen “HSBC Holdings PLC”, “Barclays PLC”, “Santander UK PLC” with parameters {“schema”: “LegalEntity”, “properties”: {“name”: [“HSBC”], “country”: [“UK”], “topics”: [“sanction”, “pep”]}} to identify AML or governance violations, supporting negligence and statutory duty claims under FSMA 2000 and 5AMLD. Screen “Credit Suisse” with {“schema”: “LegalEntity”, “properties”: {“name”: [“Credit Suisse”], “country”: [“UK”]}} to uncover UK sanctions or PEP links post-FINMA’s 2021-2022 findings, reinforcing negligence claims. For complicity and greenwashing, screen “JBS SA” and “Cargill” with {“schema”: “LegalEntity”, “properties”: {“name”: [“JBS”, “Cargill”], “country”: [“Brazil”], “topics”: [“sanction”]}} to link Amazon financing to sanctioned entities, per BANKS AMMU. Use the /search endpoint for “AML banking violation” with schema “LegalEntity” and sort “first_seen:desc” to find recent sanctions or PEP entries (2020-2025). Combine keywords like “deforestation financing” or “AML non-compliance” for precision. Automate daily API calls to monitor new entries, ensuring timely evidence within the six-year limitation period.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: The bank searches target negligence by seeking AML compliance failures, leveraging TI_ BORs.pdf’s findings on poor transparency and Spanish Guidance-Beneficial-Ownership-Legal-Persons.pdf’s 5AMLD requirements. Statutory duty breaches are supported if banks failed to report sanctions or PEP compliance, aligning with TI’s findings. The CS search aligns with FINMA’s supervisory breach finding, seeking UK sanctions data to evidence negligence in risk management (e.g., liquidity issues from BANKS AMMU). The JBS/Cargill search supports complicity and greenwashing, linking Amazon financing to sanctioned entities, potentially breaching public interest duties. These searches support the BoE JR by evidencing AML/ESG supervisory gaps (QOL 4, QOL 3), as the BoE should monitor such risks.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: API results could reveal sanctions or PEP links for HSBC, Barclays, or Santander, supporting negligence claims by showing inadequate AML due diligence, and statutory duty breaches if FSMA/5AMLD obligations were unmet. For example, a sanctioned subsidiary could indicate governance failures. CS sanctions data would reinforce negligence claims, supporting JR arguments of BoE’s oversight failures. JBS/Cargill sanctions links strengthen complicity claims, proving banks enabled harmful activities, and greenwashing claims if ESG commitments are contradicted. For the JR, sanctions data supports irrationality and procedural impropriety claims, as the BoE ignored such risks (Letter Before Claim). For monetization, sanctions-related claims attract funders like Harbour (info@harbourlf.com) due to their high value (HOW 2 SELL MY LITIGATION). Execute searches via API integration, testing parameters on test.opensanctions.org, and analyze results for specific entities or penalties.
—
### 3. https://www.opensanctions.org/docs/bulk/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: This page describes OpenSanctions’ bulk data distributions, combining 287 sources into datasets (sanctions, PEPs, debarred entities), available for download or API access, updated daily, as per web results. SEARCHLINK Model.pdf highlights its role in sanctions screening, with datasets supporting searches by entity, country, and topic via tools like OpenSearch for complex queries. No specific advanced search rules are provided, but bulk data enables full-text and structured searches with filters for entity type, country, and topics.
**Search Strategy**: Download the “sanctions” and “peps” datasets and search “HSBC Holdings PLC”, “Barclays PLC”, “Santander UK PLC” using OpenSearch with filters for UK entities and topics “sanction” or “pep” to identify AML violations, supporting negligence and statutory duty claims. Search “Credit Suisse” with UK filter to uncover sanctions post-FINMA’s findings, reinforcing negligence. Search “JBS SA Cargill” with Brazil filter and “sanction-linked entity” topic to link Amazon financing to sanctioned entities, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims. Use full-text searches with keywords “AML failure” or “deforestation financing” (2020-2025) to capture recent violations. Analyze datasets locally to identify specific entities, sanctions dates, or penalties within the limitation period.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Bank searches target negligence and statutory duty breaches, leveraging TI’s transparency findings and 5AMLD requirements. CS searches align with FINMA’s finding, seeking negligence evidence. JBS/Cargill searches support complicity and greenwashing, tied to Amazon financing. These support JR arguments of BoE’s AML/ESG oversight failures (QOL 4, QOL 3).
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Bulk data could reveal sanctions or PEP links, supporting negligence claims and JR arguments of regulatory gaps. JBS/Cargill sanctions data strengthens complicity claims, boosting monetization value for funders like Certum (info@certumgroup.com). Download datasets and use OpenSearch for local analysis, focusing on recent entries.
—
### 4. https://www.opensanctions.org/faq/150/downloading
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: This FAQ page explains downloading OpenSanctions’ datasets (sanctions, PEPs, etc.) for offline analysis, updated daily, as per web results. No specific search rules are provided, but datasets support full-text and structured queries via OpenSearch, with filters for entity, country, and topic, similar to the bulk data page.
**Search Strategy**: Download the “default” dataset and search “HSBC Barclays Santander” with UK filter and “sanction” or “pep” topics using OpenSearch to find AML violations, supporting negligence and statutory duty claims. Search “Credit Suisse” for UK sanctions post-FINMA finding. Search “JBS Cargill” with Brazil filter and “sanction-linked” topic for complicity evidence. Use keywords “AML banking” or “ESG violation” for full-text searches (2020-2025) to ensure relevance within limitation periods.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Similar to the bulk data page, this targets negligence, statutory duty breaches, and complicity, leveraging TI’s findings, FINMA’s CS finding, and Amazon financing. JR arguments are supported by regulatory gaps.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Dataset results could evidence AML or sanctions issues, supporting negligence and JR claims. JBS/Cargill links enhance complicity claims, boosting monetization for funders like Bench Walk (info@benchwalk.com). Download and analyze offline with OpenSearch.
—
### 5. https://globaltradealert.org/data-center
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The Global Trade Alert (GTA) Data Center, as per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf, tracks state-level trade policy measures, supporting searches by implementing/affected jurisdictions, intervention types (harmful/liberalizing), and sectors. The “Explore curated datasets” function allows filtering, ideal for identifying trade barriers like WTO Article III.4 violations. Web results suggest robust data on trade interventions, with advanced filtering capabilities.
**Search Strategy**: Search “harmful trade measures financial services Brazil” with filters for implementing jurisdiction (Brazil) and sector (financial services, NACE K64) to identify trade barriers linked to Amazon financing, supporting complicity claims. Search “banking trade barriers UK” with affected jurisdiction (UK) to find trade violations involving HSBC, Barclays, or Santander, targeting negligence and competition claims. Use “WTO violation banking” with date range 2020-2025 to uncover trade policy breaches, supporting state aid or competition claims. Combine keywords like “deforestation trade barrier” for precision. If API access is available, automate searches for new measures.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Trade barrier searches target complicity, linking Amazon financing to harmful measures (BANKS AMMU). UK searches address negligence (e.g., trade compliance failures) and competition breaches, potentially tied to undisclosed mergers (MA DISCLOSURES). These support JR arguments of BoE’s ESG oversight failures (QOL 4, QOL 3).
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Trade barrier data could quantify environmental harms from Amazon financing, strengthening complicity claims and JR arguments of BoE’s oversight failures. UK trade violations support negligence and competition claims, enhancing monetization value for funders like Fortress. Manually search the Data Center or use API if available.
—
### 6. https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/industries
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: Mayer Brown’s industries page likely details legal services across sectors like banking and financial services, covering litigation, mergers, and ESG issues, based on web results and implied functionality from SEARCHLINK Model.pdf. No explicit advanced search rules are provided, but it likely supports keyword searches for case studies, insights, or publications, with possible filters for sector or date.
**Search Strategy**: Search “banking litigation HSBC Barclays Santander” to find case studies on negligence or competition claims, focusing on 2020-2025 for recent data. Search “banking ESG Amazon deforestation” to uncover insights on environmental misconduct, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims. Search “AML banking compliance” to identify regulatory violation cases, leveraging TI’s transparency findings. Combine keywords like “cartel banking” or “greenwashing NEAR/10 ESG” for precision. If filters are available, select “Banking & Financial Services” and “Litigation”.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Litigation searches target negligence (e.g., risk management failures) and competition breaches (e.g., anti-competitive practices), tied to undisclosed mergers (MA DISCLOSURES) and FINMA’s CS finding. ESG searches support complicity and greenwashing, linked to Amazon financing. AML searches address statutory duty breaches, leveraging TI’s findings. These support JR arguments of BoE’s oversight failures.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Case studies could evidence bank misconduct (e.g., AML or ESG failures), supporting negligence, competition, and JR claims. ESG insights strengthen complicity claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Harbour. Manually search the page for relevant publications or insights.
—
### 7. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: Companies House, as per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf, is the UK’s public register for company data, supporting advanced searches by company name, registration number (CRN), SIC code, status (active/inactive), and dates (incorporation, dissolution). It provides ownership, director, and filing details (e.g., annual reports, Persons with Significant Control (PSC) registers), critical for mapping corporate structures and mergers.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Holdings PLC”, “Barclays PLC”, “Santander UK PLC” by name or CRN to retrieve ownership, PSC, and merger filings, supporting negligence (governance failures) and competition claims (market concentration). Search “Credit Suisse” for UK entity data post-FINMA finding, targeting negligence. Use SIC 6419 (banking) to identify sector mergers, leveraging MA DISCLOSURES’ undisclosed merger data. Search “Amazon deforestation” in annual reports (2020-2025) for ESG disclosures, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims. Use exact phrases like “merger acquisition” or “ESG compliance” and filter by filing date to ensure relevance within limitation periods.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Ownership and PSC searches target negligence (e.g., inadequate governance) and competition breaches (e.g., undisclosed mergers), tied to MA DISCLOSURES and FINMA’s CS finding. ESG searches support complicity and greenwashing, linked to Amazon financing and TI’s transparency issues. These support JR arguments of BoE’s oversight failures (QOL 4, QOL 3).
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: PSC and merger filings could reveal opaque structures or consolidations, supporting negligence, competition, and JR claims. ESG disclosures contradicting Amazon financing strengthen complicity claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Certum (info@certumgroup.com). Manually search or use the Companies House API for automation, focusing on recent filings.
—
### 8. https://www.sede.registradores.org/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The Spanish Registries portal, as per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf, provides data on Spanish companies, including legal representatives, directors, and financial accounts, with statistical portals (Estadisticas Mercantiles, ratios-sectoriales) for sectoral analysis. It supports searches by company name and director details, with limited advanced filtering, focusing on ownership and financial data.
**Search Strategy**: Search “Banco Santander SA” by name to retrieve ownership, director, and financial account data, supporting negligence (governance failures) and competition claims (market concentration). Search “Amazon deforestation financing” in financial accounts (2020-2025) to link Santander to harmful activities, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims. Use sectoral filters for banking (NACE K64) to identify mergers, leveraging MA DISCLOSURES’ undisclosed merger data. Combine keywords like “merger acquisition” or “ESG violation” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Ownership searches target negligence and competition breaches, tied to undisclosed mergers and TI’s transparency findings. ESG searches support complicity, linked to Amazon financing (BANKS AMMU). These support JR arguments of BoE’s oversight failures, as Santander’s UK operations fall under BoE supervision.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Ownership data could reveal governance issues, supporting negligence and JR claims. ESG links in financial accounts strengthen complicity claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Bench Walk (info@benchwalk.com). Manually search the portal, focusing on recent accounts.
—
### 9. https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: SEC EDGAR, as per SEARCHLINK Model.pdf, provides US company filings (e.g., Form 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K), searchable by company name, Central Index Key (CIK), and SIC code. It supports keyword searches within filings, ideal for merger, litigation, and ESG data, with advanced filtering for filing type and date.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Holdings PLC”, “Barclays PLC”, “Santander UK PLC” with SIC 6021 (national commercial banks) for Form 8-K Item 2 reports (2020-2025), targeting undisclosed mergers (MA DISCLOSURES) for competition claims. Search “Credit Suisse” for 10-K litigation disclosures post-FINMA finding (2021-2022). Search “Amazon deforestation financing” in 10-K/10-Q filings for ESG disclosures, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims. Use keywords “AML violation” or “greenwashing” with date filter 2020-2025 to ensure relevance. Combine terms like “merger AND banking” or “ESG NEAR/10 deforestation” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Merger searches target competition breaches, tied to MA DISCLOSURES’ $2.3 trillion in undisclosed mergers. CS searches align with FINMA’s finding, supporting negligence. ESG searches support complicity and greenwashing, linked to Amazon financing and TI’s transparency issues. These support JR arguments of BoE’s oversight failures.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: 8-K reports could reveal hidden mergers, supporting competition and JR claims. CS litigation disclosures strengthen negligence claims, while ESG disclosures contradicting Amazon financing support complicity claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Fortress. Manually search EDGAR or use API for automation.
—
### 10. https://www.globalspec.com/search/products?categoryIds=5346
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: GlobalSpec is an engineering product search platform, with category 5346 (Banking and Financial Services) covering software and services, based on web results. It likely supports keyword searches by company, product, or service, with no explicit advanced search rules but possible filters for sector or provider.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander banking software” to identify financial services linked to public contracts, supporting negligence (inadequate compliance tools) and externality claims (public contract failures). Search “ESG compliance banking” for software related to sustainability, supporting greenwashing claims. Search “AML software” to find compliance tools, leveraging TI’s transparency findings. Use date filter 2020-2025 if available to focus on recent products.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Software searches target negligence (failure to implement robust AML/ESG systems) and externality costs, tied to TI’s findings and Amazon financing for greenwashing. These support JR arguments of BoE’s oversight failures.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Software data could reveal inadequate compliance systems, supporting negligence and JR claims. ESG software gaps strengthen greenwashing claims, enhancing monetization for funders like Harbour. Manually search the platform for relevant products or services.
—
### Conclusion
Each SEARCHLINK offers unique evidence-gathering opportunities, from OpenSanctions’ sanctions data to EDGAR’s merger filings, targeting our causes of action and infringement findings. Due to my inability to visit websites directly, please execute these searches manually or share results for further analysis. Provide specific loss dates to confirm limitation periods (e.g., six years for negligence, three months for JR) and any additional documents to refine strategies. I can assist with contacting funders like Fortress or Harbour for monetization or drafting further legal documents. If I misunderstood your “stuck” concern or you meant a different task, please clarify, and I’ll adjust immediately.
1. https://www.publicsector.co.uk/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The SEARCHLINK Model.pdf describes publicsector.co.uk (OSCAR) as a supplementary UK public procurement portal with a database of public sector organizations, suppliers, and contracts, containing over 500 million data points. It supports choice, collaboration, and knowledge for UK public services, covering entities from care homes to government departments. Key features include organizational and location searching, mapping, and linkage, providing details on service providers, elected representatives, organizational structures, metrics, demographics, ratings, contractors, news, and events. The web result () confirms it offers unique searching for local service providers, suppliers, and contractors, with a supplier subscription for tender alerts and event postings. Advanced search capabilities are not explicitly detailed, but the platform likely supports keyword and category-based searches for organizations, contracts, and suppliers, given its focus on detailed data mapping.[](https://www.publicsector.co.uk/)
**Search Strategy**: To gather evidence supporting our causes of action (negligence, competition law breaches, externality costs) and infringement findings (potential FCA/CMA findings on ESG or competition), I propose a multi-step search strategy. First, search for “banking services contracts HSBC Barclays Santander” to identify public sector contracts awarded to these banks, focusing on high-value contracts (above £139,688) that may involve branch closures or ESG-related services. Use filters for contract type (services), procurement stage (award), and buyer name (e.g., local councils, NHS trusts) to pinpoint contracts in areas affected by closures (e.g., Settle, Cheshunt, Eltham). Second, search for “supplier compliance banking” to uncover any recorded violations or performance issues by these banks, leveraging the platform’s regulatory data. Third, search for “public sector banking tender ESG” to find tender documents emphasizing sustainability, which could reveal banks’ ESG commitments versus their Amazon financing activities, supporting greenwashing claims. If the platform supports historical data, set date ranges from 2020-2025 to capture recent contracts post-5AMLD (EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive). If API access is available, automate searches for daily updates on new banking tenders or supplier issues.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: This strategy targets negligence by seeking evidence of banks’ failure to deliver contracted public services (e.g., branch closures harming vulnerable communities), supported by externality cost claims for social harm. Competition law breaches are addressed by identifying contracts that suggest market dominance (e.g., banks securing multiple public contracts, reducing competition). The ESG search aligns with the Amazon financing infringement, seeking discrepancies between banks’ public sector ESG commitments and their deforestation-linked activities, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims. The FINMA CS finding is less directly relevant, but searching for “Credit Suisse public sector contracts” could reveal UK impacts of its mismanagement, supporting negligence claims.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: The platform may yield contract award notices showing HSBC, Barclays, or Santander’s involvement in public sector banking, potentially linked to branch closures, evidencing negligence and externality harms (e.g., reduced access in underserved areas). Supplier compliance data could reveal FCA sanctions or performance failures, supporting statutory duty breaches under FSMA 2000. ESG-related tender documents could contrast banks’ public commitments with their Amazon financing, strengthening complicity and greenwashing claims. For the BoE JR, evidence of banks’ unchecked dominance in public contracts supports irrationality (QOL 4) in supervision. For monetization, detailed contract data enhances the value of competition and ESG claims, attractive to funders like Fortress (opportunities@fortress.com) for purchase, as public sector impacts resonate with investors.
—
### 2. https://www.gov.uk/search/advanced
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: GOV.UK is the central portal for UK government departments, agencies, and public bodies, providing policy documents, reports, and datasets (SEARCHLINK Model.pdf). Its advanced search, as per the document, supports keyword searches, filters by department, publication type (e.g., policy papers, statistical reports), and date range. Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT, exact phrases with “”) and wildcards are implied for precision. The web result () notes cookie settings for analytics, suggesting robust data tracking, and mentions public body lists, indicating access to regulatory outputs.[](https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations)
**Search Strategy**: To support our causes of action and infringement findings, I propose searching “Bank of England FPC systemic risk report 2023-2025” with filters for BoE publications and date range 2023-2025 to obtain Financial Policy Committee (FPC) minutes or reports on banking risks, supporting JR grounds of irrationality and failure to consider ESG/market concentration risks. Next, search “FCA banking sector enforcement HSBC Barclays Santander” with FCA as the department and “enforcement notices” as the publication type to find regulatory actions against these banks, supporting negligence and statutory duty claims. Search “CMA banking sector merger investigation” with CMA as the department to uncover merger inquiries or market studies, targeting competition law breaches and potential FCA/CMA findings. For ESG, search “banking ESG compliance Amazon financing” to find government reports on bank sustainability failures, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims. Use exact phrases (e.g., “significant lessening of competition”) and combine with AND (e.g., “HSBC AND deforestation”) for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: The FPC search targets BoE JR grounds (illegality, irrationality) by seeking evidence of overlooked systemic risks (e.g., CS/SVB crises, market concentration), aligning with FINMA’s CS finding as a parallel supervisory failure. FCA enforcement searches address negligence and statutory duty breaches, potentially revealing AML or ESG violations by banks. CMA searches target competition law breaches, leveraging the MA DISCLOSURES finding of undisclosed mergers to argue market distortion. ESG searches link to the Amazon financing infringement, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: FPC reports could confirm BoE’s awareness of systemic risks, strengthening JR arguments of irrational oversight (QOL 4). FCA enforcement notices may detail bank misconduct (e.g., AML failures, ESG misstatements), supporting negligence and statutory duty claims. CMA merger inquiries could reveal bank consolidation patterns, grounding competition claims. ESG reports could expose banks’ contradictory sustainability claims, enhancing complicity claims. This evidence strengthens the JR by proving BoE’s supervisory gaps and supports private claims for monetization, as regulatory findings attract funders like Harbour (info@harbourlf.com).
—
### 3. https://e-justice.europa.eu/advancedSearchManagement?action=advancedSearch
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The e-Justice Portal’s advanced search (SEARCHLINK Model.pdf) provides access to EU case law, legislation, and legal documents via EUR-Lex and CURIA integrations. It supports Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT, exact phrases), proximity searches, and filters by case number, parties, court (CJEU/General Court), case status, and subject-matter (e.g., competition, environment). The portal is critical for tracking EU-level precedents and regulatory actions.
**Search Strategy**: Search “competition law banking HSBC Barclays Santander” with filters for CJEU/General Court, case type (antitrust, merger), and status (closed, 2020-2025) to find EU competition cases against these banks, supporting competition law breaches. Search “environmental law banking Amazon deforestation” with subject-matter filter “environment” to uncover cases linking banks to ESG harms, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims. Use “beneficial ownership banking AML” to find AML violation cases, leveraging TI’s transparency findings and 5AMLD requirements. Combine terms like “abuse of dominance AND banking” or “greenwashing AND financial sector” for precision. If available, use proximity searches (e.g., “banking NEAR/10 deforestation”) to refine results.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Competition searches target abuse of dominance and anti-competitive agreements, linking to undisclosed mergers (MA DISCLOSURES) and potential CMA findings. Environmental searches address complicity and greenwashing, directly tied to Amazon financing (BANKS AMMU). AML searches support negligence and statutory duty claims, leveraging TI’s findings on poor bank transparency. CS’s FINMA finding is indirectly relevant, as EU cases may reveal similar supervisory failures.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: EU competition cases could provide precedents or findings against banks, supporting standalone or follow-on competition claims. Environmental cases may link banks to deforestation harms, strengthening complicity claims. AML cases could reveal regulatory breaches, supporting negligence claims and BoE JR arguments of supervisory failure. These high-profile EU findings enhance claim value for sale to Certum (info@certumgroup.com), as cross-border impacts attract investors.
—
### 4. https://e-justice.europa.eu/topics/registers-business-insolvency-land/business-registers-search-company-eu_en
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: This e-Justice Portal section connects to EU business registers, including Companies House (UK) and Spanish Registries, for company data (SEARCHLINK Model.pdf). It supports searches by company name, registration number, and jurisdiction, with limited advanced filtering. The focus is on corporate structures, ownership, and insolvency records, critical for identifying beneficial owners and merger activities.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Holdings PLC”, “Barclays PLC”, “Santander UK PLC” by company name in UK jurisdiction to retrieve ownership and directorship details, supporting negligence and competition claims. Search “Credit Suisse UK” to explore its UK entities post-FINMA finding, targeting negligence claims. Use “banking mergers 2020-2025” to identify acquisitions, leveraging MA DISCLOSURES’ undisclosed merger data. If possible, filter by SIC codes for banking (6419) to map sector players. Cross-reference with OpenCorporates for global subsidiaries involved in Amazon financing.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Ownership searches target negligence (e.g., governance failures) and competition breaches (e.g., market concentration via mergers), linking to undisclosed mergers and FINMA’s CS finding. Merger searches support competition claims, identifying hidden consolidations. Amazon financing ties to complicity claims, as ownership data may reveal links to deforestation entities.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Ownership records could reveal opaque structures, supporting AML-related negligence claims and BoE JR arguments of lax oversight. Merger data strengthens competition claims, especially if banks acquired smaller competitors. This evidence enhances JR by proving regulatory gaps and supports private claims for monetization, as structural data appeals to funders like Bench Walk (info@benchwalk.com).
—
### 5. https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/searchCaseInstruments
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The EC Competition Portal (SEARCHLINK Model.pdf) tracks EU antitrust, cartel, merger, and state aid cases, with an integrated case search by case number, company name, and NACE code. It supports filtering by case type (e.g., merger, antitrust) and status, providing enforcement decisions and public consultation opportunities.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander banking” with filters for merger and antitrust cases (2020-2025) to find EU actions against these banks, supporting competition law breaches. Search “state aid banking UK” to identify subsidies distorting competition, targeting state aid claims. Search “ESG banking Amazon” with NACE code for financial services (K64) to uncover environmental violation cases, supporting complicity claims. Use exact phrases like “abuse of dominance” or “cartel banking” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Merger/antitrust searches target competition breaches, aligning with undisclosed mergers and potential CMA findings. State aid searches address subsidy distortions, relevant to competition claims. ESG searches link to Amazon financing, supporting complicity and greenwashing claims. CS’s FINMA finding informs parallel EU supervisory failure arguments.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: EU merger/antitrust decisions could ground follow-on competition claims, while state aid findings support subsidy control claims. ESG cases strengthen complicity claims, enhancing JR arguments of BoE’s ESG oversight failures. These findings increase claim value for sale to Fortress, as EU decisions carry significant weight.
—
### 6. https://db-comp.eu/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: This platform (not explicitly in SEARCHLINK Model.pdf but implied via EC competition context) likely aggregates EU competition law data, including case law and regulatory actions. Assuming similar functionality to the EC Competition Portal, it supports searches by company, case type, and legal issue, with Boolean operators for precision.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander competition law” with filters for antitrust and merger cases (2020-2025) to find EU enforcement actions, supporting competition claims. Search “banking greenwashing ESG” to uncover environmental misconduct cases, targeting complicity claims. Use “AML banking transparency” to find AML violation cases, leveraging TI’s findings. Combine terms like “cartel AND banking” or “greenwashing NEAR/10 Amazon”.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Competition searches address abuse of dominance and anti-competitive agreements, tied to undisclosed mergers. ESG searches target complicity and greenwashing, linked to Amazon financing. AML searches support negligence and statutory duty claims, reinforcing TI’s transparency issues. CS’s FINMA finding informs potential EU parallels.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: EU competition cases could provide follow-on claim grounds, while ESG and AML findings support private claims and JR arguments of regulatory failure. These strengthen monetization prospects, as EU data appeals to funders like Harbour.
—
### 7. https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The EU Trade Policy portal (SEARCHLINK Model.pdf) covers trade barriers, disputes, and policies, with search capabilities for trade measures and sectors. It likely supports keyword searches and filters by jurisdiction, sector, or measure type, relevant for identifying trade-related bank activities.
**Search Strategy**: Search “banking trade barriers Amazon financing” with filters for financial services and South America to find trade measures linked to deforestation, supporting complicity claims. Search “HSBC Santander trade violations” to uncover bank involvement in trade disputes, targeting competition or negligence claims. Use “WTO banking ESG” to find trade policy breaches, leveraging Global Trade Alert strategies.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Trade barrier searches target complicity claims, linking banks’ financing to environmental harms. Trade violation searches address negligence and competition breaches, potentially tied to undisclosed mergers. These align with Amazon financing and TI’s transparency findings.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Trade barrier data could prove banks’ role in harmful activities, supporting complicity claims and JR arguments of BoE’s ESG oversight failures. This evidence enhances claim value for sale to Certum, as trade-related claims attract global investors.
—
### 8. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/home
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: The EU Access2Markets portal (SEARCHLINK Model.pdf) details trade barriers, tariffs, and trade flows, with statistics on affected products/sectors. It supports searches by product, jurisdiction, and barrier type, with advanced filtering for trade data.
**Search Strategy**: Search “Amazon deforestation financing banking” with filters for financial services and Brazil to quantify trade impacts, supporting complicity claims. Search “HSBC Santander trade barriers” to find bank-linked trade violations, targeting negligence. Use “trade flow banking 2020-2025” to analyze financial sector trade patterns, supporting competition claims. Combine terms like “deforestation AND banking” for precision.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Deforestation searches target complicity and greenwashing, linked to Amazon financing. Trade barrier searches address negligence and competition breaches, tied to undisclosed mergers. These leverage TI’s transparency findings for AML context.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Trade impact data could quantify environmental harms, strengthening complicity claims and JR arguments. Trade violation evidence supports negligence claims, enhancing monetization value for funders like Bench Walk.
—
### 9. https://www.investegate.co.uk/advanced-search
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: Investegate (SEARCHLINK Model.pdf) is a UK RNS aggregator for listed company announcements, supporting searches by company name, EPIC/TIDM code, date range, and announcement categories (e.g., Mergers, Acquisitions and Disposals). It allows keyword searches within announcement texts, with Boolean operators and exact phrases.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Barclays Santander merger acquisition” with filters for “Mergers, Acquisitions and Disposals” (2020-2025) to identify undisclosed mergers, supporting competition claims. Search “ESG Amazon deforestation” with “Director’s Dealings” filter to find governance failures, targeting negligence and complicity. Use “AML compliance failure” to uncover transparency issues, leveraging TI’s findings. Combine terms like “acquisition AND banking” or “greenwashing NEAR/10 ESG”.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Merger searches target competition breaches, tied to MA DISCLOSURES’ undisclosed mergers. ESG searches address complicity and greenwashing, linked to Amazon financing. AML searches support negligence and statutory duty claims, reinforcing TI’s findings. CS’s FINMA finding informs potential governance parallels.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Merger announcements could reveal hidden consolidations, supporting competition claims and JR arguments of BoE’s oversight failure. ESG and AML data strengthen negligence and complicity claims, enhancing monetization value for Fortress.
—
### 10. https://opencorporates.com/companies
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: OpenCorporates (SEARCHLINK Model.pdf) is a global corporate registry aggregator, covering 140+ jurisdictions. It supports searches by company name, jurisdiction, and officer name, with API access for automated monitoring. Advanced filters include company status (active/inactive) and SIC/NACE codes.
**Search Strategy**: Search “HSBC Holdings PLC”, “Barclays PLC”, “Santander UK PLC” with UK jurisdiction to map ownership and directors, supporting negligence and competition claims. Search “Credit Suisse” to explore UK entities post-FINMA finding. Use “banking SIC 6419 mergers” to identify acquisitions, targeting competition breaches. Search “Amazon deforestation companies JBS Cargill” to link banks to harmful entities, supporting complicity claims. Use API for ongoing monitoring of director changes.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Ownership searches target negligence (governance failures) and competition breaches (market concentration), linked to undisclosed mergers and FINMA’s CS finding. Deforestation searches address complicity, tied to Amazon financing and TI’s transparency issues.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Ownership data could reveal opaque structures, supporting AML-related negligence claims and JR arguments. Merger data strengthens competition claims, while deforestation links enhance complicity claims, increasing value for sale to Harbour.
—
### 11. https://opencorporates.com/registers
**Platform Overview and Advanced Search Rules**: This OpenCorporates section lists global company registers, linking to national databases like Companies House. It supports searches by jurisdiction and register type, with limited advanced filtering but access to primary sources.
**Search Strategy**: Access the UK Companies House link and search “HSBC Barclays Santander” for ownership and merger filings, supporting competition and negligence claims. Search “Credit Suisse UK” for post-FINMA entity data. Use “banking mergers 2020-2025” with SIC 6419 to identify consolidations. Cross-reference with Amazon financing entities (JBS, Cargill) for complicity claims.
**Targeting Causes of Action and Infringements**: Similar to the previous OpenCorporates link, this targets negligence, competition breaches, and complicity, leveraging undisclosed mergers, FINMA’s finding, and Amazon financing.
**Potential Evidence and Case Support**: Companies House filings could reveal merger or governance issues, supporting competition and negligence claims. Deforestation links strengthen complicity claims, enhancing JR and monetization prospects.
—
### Conclusion
Each SEARCHLINK offers unique evidence-gathering opportunities, from publicsector.co.uk’s contract data to OpenCorporates’ ownership records, targeting our causes of action and infringement findings. I’ve designed precise search strategies to uncover regulatory, corporate, and trade-related evidence, supporting the BoE JR and private claims. Due to my inability to visit websites directly, please execute these searches manually or share results for further analysis. Provide specific loss dates to confirm limitation periods, and let me know if you need assistance contacting funders like Fortress or Harbour to monetize claims.[](https://www.publicsector.co.uk/)